The fundamental thing to know about IARC’s listing of things as “possible” carcinogens is that they will list things unless there is *conclusive proof* that they aren’t carcinogenic.
The problem with this concept is that it’s literally impossible to prove a negative.
Aspartame is made up of two amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. It has been extensively studied for half a century, and there has yet to be any of the hundreds of studies that shows a conclusive link to “cancer” (which is itself a catch-all term for dozens of different conditions, each with their own causes).
IARC is not a food/chemical safety research organization. They don’t do any of their own research. This list is not based on a thorough consideration of all the science.
Latest Answers