What i am trying to ask is that if foods for example rice as main carbohydrates that have been eaten for 1000 of years in your generations is more effective for your body than if a person moved to a different country/culture that have spaghetti for example as their main carbohydrates.
Long story short do humans benefits more from eating the diet/types of food that their ancestors also ate.
Sorry if this question makes you confused.
In: 0
Not really. Rice isn’t crazy different from wheat or corn other grains. Your stomach does the same to all of them.
And once you compare spagetthi to Chinese noodles, the difference is basically only aethetic.
Chicken is chicken, no matter where it comes from.
Dairy and alcohol are the only exceptions here as far as I know, because of their relative toxicity they did have an evolutionary effect and populations that historically didn’t drink milk or alcohol are still intolerant to milk and alcohol.
Latest Answers