In theory, one of the limiting factors is trying to prevent the fuel from being blasted apart, since you need to maintain a certain density to properly achieve criticality for both fusion and fission, although I’m not sure if that’s the biggest one besides practicality
The speculation about the atmosphere was more a what if hypothetical than an actual concern, like [T. Folse](https://youtu.be/QwcHBize_xI?si=bf8LYHG1Bsp1E4Eo) jokes, in the nuclear industry 1+1=100 to be on the safe side, to make that hypothetical even possible you’d need to multiple that by multiple orders of magnitude, that it’s effective impossible
>The limits were luckily never tested, but in general, I would say, the density of the atmosphere is too low,” Wiescher responded when asked whether a powerful enough bomb to burn the Earth’s atmosphere could ever be built.
>“If one would substantially increase the atmospheric density to Venus values — 100 times denser than Earth — one would still not have the density of water, and the underwater test program did not ignite the oceans, as some people predicted,” he elaborated.
Latest Answers