eli5: Carl Sagan’s absence of evidence

4.85K views

Big fan of Carl Sagan, he was like a father figure to me, I’m partially molded by him.
That said, something he used to say all the time really baffled me, still does:
“Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”
He said this when talking about aliens.
However: Sagan was a famous non believer.
How does this aphorism reconcile with the existence or non existence of a god?
If “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” does that apply to a god as well?
Is there a god even though there is no evidence of him/her/it?

In: 95

147 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

This is just a generalisation of the fact that it is usually very very hard to prove that no sollution exists at all to a given problem.

We can safely say that we dont have a sollution, but to say for certain that there is none is next to impossible usually.

You are viewing 1 out of 147 answers, click here to view all answers.