Of course they do. Those bombs cost thousands of dollars. Each. Some cost tens of thousands of dollars, depending on their guidance system.
Every missile launched, every bomb dropped, every bullet fired has a cost/benefit analysis tied to it. Contrary to popular opinion, the actual cost of the operation is taken into account during mission planning.
For example, say you’ve spotted a radio transmitter that is acting as a relay for enemy communications up on the ridgeline and you want to take it out. Well, you could bomb it from above, but that costs dozens of manhours just to keep the aircraft operational, let alone the actual monetary value of the fuel, parts, and the cost the munitions themselves. Far cheaper to send a helicopter up there and blow it apart, right? Right, except the Apache isn’t cheap, either, as it is a specialized helo and *shits* through fuel (they’re heavy bastards), plus the 30mm cannon rounds are expensive as hell, even if they *are* cheaper than a Hellfire or Hydra. What’s the terrain look like? Can we just send a squad of dudes up there to rip it apart? Well, yeah, maybe, but not without top cover in case there are Bad Guys hiding in the crevices or operating out of caves, and if we’re going to have top cover we might as well use *it* to blast the relay tower apart. Keep in mind this is a home-built radio relay using probably $100 worth of parts, we don’t want to spend a million bucks to blow it up when they can just rebuild it two days from now. Is it in range of a mortar or artillery strike? Cool, let’s just do that, instead.
This is something movies fail to account for (except *Whiskey Tango Foxtrot* with Tina Fey and Billy Bob Thorton), as it isn’t the exciting part of warfare in the slightest, but there are *absolutely* battlefield accountants keeping track of all of the expenditures.
Latest Answers