I’m confused why the term watt-hours (Wh) is used. Watts is joules per second. So watt-hours is joules per second per hour. There are 2 time measurements within the same term.
Why not just use joules for total amount of energy used and watts for consistent/average output over a specific time? I assume watt-hours is how many watts are consistently produced over an hour period but it is used often in unhelpful scenarios. When talking about say solar generation, someone could say “my solar array produces 12kWh every day”. So 12kWh for 24 hours means your solar array produces 0.5kW of power for the entire day. How was watt-hours helpful in anyway to describe the solar array’s power output?
Or when talking about a cities power output, the reports are measured in Gigawatt-hours over the entire year. Why is quantifying a cities yearly output over an hour long period helpful?
Now if we compare the 2 given examples, it becomes even more confusing. If I had a solar array that produces 12kWh every day, how many solar arrays would I need to power a city the needs 5000 GWh every year? 5000 GWh every year is around 570.78 MW, so if I just used the standard watts over watt-hours I would have a simple convertion between scenarios while still having the option to say “0.5kWs each day” or “570.78MWs for a year”.
Sorry if this is sounding like a rant post but I’m really annoyed at this term.
In: 2
The unit is historical. People know how long an hour is, and if they run a 0.5 kW appliance for a certain number of hours, they can estimate the cost of electricity. A second is too short. Or they roughly how much work can be done by 1 kWh because they have used the unit for so long. If we switched to megajoules, the number would be 3.6 times greater, and might raise suspicion of getting overcharged.
In the case of the solar battery, the amount of energy per longer period might be more useful than instantaneous power because they only produce for a fraction of the day.
Latest Answers