eli5: how would a klein bottle work in the 4th dimension?

233 views

I just watched [this video](https://youtu.be/9Bqg-6nzkzw) by the action lab, and he explained, vaguely, how a klein bottle would work in the 4th dimension, but my little rat brain doesn’t understand one bit of it.

How could the neck part of the bottle not intersect the wall of the bulb?

In: 0

3 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

We, sadly, do not live in four dimensions. We live in three. The object in that video is not, in fact, a Klein bottle. A Klein bottle is a three-dimensional object, but it **cannot exist** in three dimensions; this is the same as how a Mobius strip is a two-dimensional object, but it cannot exist in two dimensions, but only in three. So what is the Action Lab guy actually holding? He’s holding the shadow (the math term would be “projection”) that a Klein bottle makes in three dimensions.

Think about you and your shadow. You’re a 3D object, the ground is a 2D object. The shadow you cast on the ground is 2D. Your shadow closely resembles you, but it is different. Simpler. Imagine facing with your back to the sun, and putting your hand behind your head, but not touching. From your shadow, it looks like your hand *is* touching your head, but in the 3D space you actually inhabit, it isn’t. This is an example of the sort of detail that’s lost when you project down to a lower dimension.

In the 4-dimensional space that a real Klein bottle exists in, it does not self-intersect. The geometry is fundamentally different, and there’s an extra dimension to work with so that you can bring the mouth of the tube to the bottom of the bottle from the inside, without having to go through the wall.

Consider a Mobius strip. It must exist in 3D. From 3D, we see that the two edges of the Mobius strip never touch each other; they are always separated by the same distance, the width of the strip. But consider the shadow: there is no way to make a 2D shadow of a Mobius strip so that the edges don’t touch. I recommend you try it! Take a piece of letter/A4 paper; cut a strip 1″ (2-3cm) wide, put a half-twist in it, and tape the edges together. Now find a bright light in your house that casts a good shadow, and play around, seeing if you can find a shadow that doesn’t have the edges end up crossing each other.

The Mobius strip is a 2D object in a 3D world, and taking the 2D shadow causes it to lose the ability to not self-intersect. A Klein bottle is a 3D object in a 4D world, and taking the 3D shadow causes it to lose that same ability to not self-intersect. And remember, what we see isn’t the Klein bottle itself, but rather its shadow.

Does that help at all?

Anonymous 0 Comments

We can’t really visualize 4 dimensions, but you can take the question down a dimension to get a sense of what it would be like. Consider a mobius strip. That’s a 2 dimensional object that has a twist through the 3rd dimension. Think about a mobius strip looks like in a 2d picture, how that twist is represented, that visual trick is what’s happening in the Klein bottles that we make in 3 dimensional space.

Anonymous 0 Comments

The same way that two roads must intersect on a (2D) map, but can pass over/under each other (overpass) in the 3D world. The 2D map doesn’t have “thickness”, so there’s no “room” to go up and build an overpass. But with an extra dimension, it’s possible for the roads to not intersect.

We can’t see 4D, we’re stuck inside a 3D (3 spatial dimensions) universe. The 4th dimension is time. If you want to look at it that way, you can have two roads in the real (3D) world pass through the same point and NOT intersect, if the *second* road simply didn’t exist at the time when the first road existed.

Someone who could see in time (4D) could see “both” roads, but they would not intersect.

Anyway, these are two ways to visualize the fact that we literally do not have the ability to see (4D) “thickness”.