Eli5: if Stalingrad was basically bombed to rubble, why did they keep fighting over it?

1.05K viewsOther

The city was practically totally destroyed. Without infrastructure wouldn’t it have just been some pile of rocks on the Volga? Why did the axis not just set up shop a few miles down the river after destroying the city?

In: Other

15 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

Both leaders were making decisions for ideological not rational reasons.

Hitler invaded the Soviet Union as a ‘Vernichtungskrieg’, a war of annihilation. Stalin was fighting an existential war to defend the motherland and prevent the destruction of communist ideology. In a speech shortly after the invasion, Stalin said “if the Germans want a Vernichtungskrieg, they will get it”.

It was a war led by two dictators with absolute power and unquestionable authority. It was inevitable that they’d go all-in against each other somewhere, and that place ending up being Stalingrad.

You are viewing 1 out of 15 answers, click here to view all answers.