Eli5: if Stalingrad was basically bombed to rubble, why did they keep fighting over it? 1.06K viewsJune 20, 2024Other Question100.55K June 19, 2024 0 Comments The city was practically totally destroyed. Without infrastructure wouldn’t it have just been some pile of rocks on the Volga? Why did the axis not just set up shop a few miles down the river after destroying the city? In: Other 15 Answers ActiveNewestOldest Anonymous Posted June 19, 2024 0 Comments The name itself. Stalin was not going to let them take the city named after him. It was symbolic You are viewing 1 out of 15 answers, click here to view all answers. Register or Login
Latest Answers