It depends.
Is it RNA viruses replicating fast or DNA viruses replicating slowly?
Do they use the same cellular components for replication? This way I’m not able to be sure which one will outcompete.
What is known for sure about such cases of superinfection. Material exchange between two viruses is possible. Formation of chimeric viruses as well. Especially if one is good at splicing.
To sum it up, superinfection is a frequent issue because 100% of us are virus positive, and single agent infection is usually achieved only in the lab.
In most cases not much. However sometimes one virus can benefit from co-infection and sometimes material can be exchanged which can benefit both.
In the first case more “simple” viruses can benefit from a more “complex” virus taking control of cellular functions like pushing the cell into the right phase of the cell cycle or shutting off the cells defenses against viral infection. Cells dont replicate genetic material all the time, so if you are a virus you might have to wait to be replicated unless you have the ability to force the cell into a replicating phase. Some viruses take this further and require co-infection to spread, for example Hepatitis D which requires the help of Hepatitis B to replicate.
In the second case genetic material between viruses can be exchanged, usually strains of the same virus. Influenza does this a lot, it actually evolved a segmented genome just so it can swap whole sections of its RNA with other flu viruses. This is why flu pandemics are so common, a totally new flu strain can pop up overnight after parts of animal flu viruses combine (like bird flu viruses combining in pigs then crossing to humans).
Latest Answers