What area the arguments in favor or against the theory?
In: 0
He believed that time is a physical “substance”, like energy or matter, and can interact with objects.
This substance has a flow, in a particular direction.
This substance also contains “memories” of past events.
If we could influence the flow of time, we can influence the future.
—
There aren’t any arguments in favour of his theory. There’s no experimental evidence and it conflicts with relativity, our most highly proven theory^(1) of how the universe works.
===
^(1)Relativity can’t explain dark energy or dark matter, and they make up 95% of the universe.
Latest Answers