Let’s say someone gets convicted of kidnapping and murder. They get life in prison for the murder and 10 years for kidnapping.
5 years later, DNA evidence proves that the defendant couldn’t have possibly killed the victim, but the fact that the defendant kidnapped the victim is still definitely true.
The life sentence can get overturned, but that prisoner would still have to serve out the last 5 years of the kidnapping sentence.
Edit: Just to be clear, I completely made this example up. The crimes and their punishments were arbitrary, I was just trying to get across why there are different sentences for one criminal.
Latest Answers