I don’t know how to answer the first question. Everyone’s DNA is just different. It uses the same 4 molecules, just in a different order.
For your second question, we don’t see molecules with a microscope. Molecules are way too small for that. We instead use one of various chemical processes to project the sequence onto a visible spectrum. The most common ways involve 4 spectro-chemicals that each bind only to one of the four nucleotides, then using spectroscopic analysis to determine the order of the spectro-chemicals, then translating that into a sequence of nucleotides. I’m simplifying a lot here though, so take this with a grain of salt.
DNA between humans is about 50% similar to that of plants and animals in general. We’re 80% identical to cows and about 90% similar to felines!
Humans are probably 99.9%+ similar to each other with a genome length of ~3.2 billion bases (each of those locations is a nucleobase either A, T, G or C). Each cell’s DNA is spaced into 46 chormosomes (23 pairs – each being a large blocks of DNA).
There is a technology called gene sequencing, where the order of each of these blocks can be read out (1st position is A T, G or C, – 2nd position is? etc). There are MANY ways that one can do this, but more modern versions use lasers and electrical currents to quickly record which base is present at either position.
Older methods (sanger sequencing) would take a piece of DNA and chemically break it into parts, separate them, and you could use the output of the experiment to effectively identify the sequence like putting together a puzzle.
>what makes everyones dna unique
First, identical twins/triplets have identical DNA, because they are clones from a split zygote.
Humans have 23 pairs of **chromosomes**, or sections of DNA that make up the human genome. 22 of those pairs are functionally the same, and one pair (the sex chromosomes) have significant differences.
During the process that creates sex cells (sperm in males, eggs in females), these chromosomes are unpaired, so the sex cell only has half the chromosomes – one of each of the first 22, and then one of the sex chromosomes (for an egg, this will be a X chromosome, for a sperm cell this will be either an X or a Y chromosome). This process randomly selects the set of 23 chromosomes in the sex cell from the parent. When the sex cell combines with another sex cell, it also gets a random set of chromosomes from that parent. This shuffles the chromosomes and generates genetic variability.
So for chromosome 1, the mother might have 1a and 1b chromosomes, and the father has 1c and 1d. Their children will have one of the following 1a1c, 1b1c, 1a1d, 1b1d. For 23 chromosomes, that is a lot of combinations. There are 8,324,608 possible combinations of 23 chromosome pairs.
But there is more variation in the DNA strands themselves – each chromosome codes DNA for thousands of proteins (genes). During DNA replication or separation, they might tangle or break. The molecules that fix DNA might mix up the broken ends, and rebuild the chromosomes into two chromosomes that are now different. The replication molecule might make a mistake, or it might be affected by chemicals in the environment or by radiation. These are mutations. Sometimes those mutations are dangerous or non-viable, but sometimes they introduce variation that can be useful, detrimental or neutral. This process of mutation also introduces changes into human DNA, and can affect minor things like skin, hair or eye colour, or major things that cause genetic diseases.
For some genes, one chromosome will override the same gene on the other chromosome (dominant genes), even if they are different. In other cases, the gene on one chromosome may not work, but because the other chromosome has a good copy, there isn’t a problem. But if both chromosomes don’t work, a genetic disease may result – a disease like cystic fibrosis is one where both parents are healthy but carry a recessive faulty gene. When they have children, they have a 1 in 4 chance of having a child with two recessive genes and the disease of cystic fibrosis.
All these mechanisms work together and introduce variability into our DNA, and that level of variability is so great that the likelihood of finding two people with the same DNA (apart from identical twins/triplets) is so great that we say that everybodies DNA is different.
To compare DNA, scientists first use a chemical process to unravel the DNA, and then clone it (a polymerase reaction). Then they slice it into segments using a chemicals that slice DNA at specific places. The fragments are tagged with fluorescent chemicals and washed into a gel using an electric field that isolates specific fragments at specific places after a fixed time. Comparing sufficient known points (loci) allows comparison of two DNA sequences.
Modern DNA sequencers can read whole DNA strands base by base, allowing full genome sequencing and comparison.
We can’t see the structure of someone’s DNA under a microscope. We have to take a sample of cells and run a process on them. This is called sequencing a genome. In the end, we get a list of billions of letters (ACGT), and the order of those letters represents the structure of the DNA.
Now, all humans’ DNA is 99.9% similar. Meaning we share almost all of it. That .1% is still millions of letters in the DNA sequence, but it’s a very small portion of the total genome.
We share 99% of our DNA with chimpanzees, and about 50% of our DNA is shared with bananas.
Geneticist here.
So first imagine two books, one is Harry Potter the other is Ulysses. The two books are substantially different, right? They are only similar in a way that they are both books and both have very common words like “the” or “he”.
Now imagine two copies of Harry Potter but from different printing. One has a typo that the other doesn’t, so they are slightly different, but the difference is really marginal on the scale of Harry Potter versus Ulysses.
So the differences between species is like differences between two different books (like, HP vs Ulysses). The differences within a species is like typos between the printings of the same book. On that scale, if two people are very different, it’s still the same book but with many typos.
But let’s see how DNA works. First imagine you want to have a necklace with your name. There are those beads with all the letters of the alphabet but you unfortunately do not have those. Instead you only have colorful beads (without letters) in 4 colors. We could come up with a secret code for the alphabet, each letter could be a certain combination of colors. Like, red-red-red equals the letter A, red-blue-red is B, blue-green-yellow is C and so on. Now you can code your name into a necklace using our secret code. Moreover, you could even send me a coded letter using colorful beads.
So DNA works exactly this way, but instead of colorful beads it is a long string of 4 different chemical components usually referred to as bases. The names of the bases are abbreviated with A, T, G and C, and it also uses runs of three to code basically everything in us. So instead of red-green-yellow you would have ATC.
But DNA is also a bit weird because in between the chapters it has long runs of bases where it doesn’t code anything. They are just there for spacing for example long CGCGCGC pieces. In genetics, the parts where DNA has any meaning are called genes, the parts in between genes have no specific name but we will call it spacer for now.
So whenever a woman and a man create a new person, they both copy their DNA and give half of it to the new person. Half mom-DNA, half dad-DNA restores the whole human DNA in the new person. Those half-copies are stored in the egg and the sperm, that’s why those need to unite.
But when the copies are made, mistakes may be made. Mistakes happen usually randomly and there are several forms of them. It can be just a change of a letter, so instead of an A dad-DNA gives away a C. It can be a missing or extra added letter, even a missing or extra long chunk of DNA.
Most of these mistakes happen in the spacer where they make no problem whatsoever. Some happens in the genes, remember, genes are the meaningful message in the DNA. A typo in a gene can be a really big problem like a genetic disease, or just some funny variation. Blue eyes were originally a typo in a gene a couple thousand years ago, before that, everyone had brown eyes.
As I said, copying errors may happen all the time when mom and dad create a new person, but not too many errors. Yet, throughout the history of humans there were a lot of moms and lot of dads so we have a lot of typos in our DNA, accumulated over history. And these typos are basically the differences between you and me.
They can manifest in a form of genetic variances: eye color, blood type, hair type, etc. But although these variations seem to create a huge lot of differences, they are actually rare, compared to the differences in the spacer DNA. You see, spacer DNA has no meaningful message, so any change in there would be invisible. It doesn’t change your eye color or your blood type. Those changes in the spacer DNA are called polymorphism.
So now, how to detect those differences. Some of them, the easiest ones you don’t have to actually detect on the DNA, because you see them. They’re in the genes and you know they are there because of the blood type or similar feature.
The next easy levels are polymorphisms. We invented detection methods before we could really read the whole DNA. You can for example copy a little part of the DNA and check how long it is. Just the length. You remember those long runs of CGCGCG I mentioned? There are other meaningless runs with different lengths. You can copy them out and tell how long is mine, how long is yours. And we have really many of those length differences collected during history of generations. These were the basis of paternity and forensic DNA tests before we could easily read the whole DNA.
And nowadays we have cheap and simple methods to read if not the whole but at least a big chunk of DNA and search for typos in it. There are some DNA services doing it for you, and it’s now really so cheap that many people do it just to figure out their ancestry.
How we can read the DNA is a bit difficult, but it’s never done by microscope or other visualization. Simply because the thread of DNA is so thin, it’s invisible. Reading DNA always involves a machine (there are different machines working on different principles). The common thing is that no matter what machine you use, the result is always just a text file containing A, T, G and C letters. There’s no fancy graphics of rotating DNA like in movies, you just get a bunch of ATGC letters on a computer and try to find differences.
(Note: some simplification was made to keep Eli5.)
Edit: grammar.
Latest Answers