Is it simply a matter of labels? Are we socialized into reserving the label of *prodigy* for fields that are traditionally held high regard? Or is classical music actually more complicated than rap and rock music, therefore warranting the use of the word *prodigy* to describe any child that excels in it?
In: Other
The word prodigy is ascribed to a child who excels in any area, whether that be language, STEM, art, sports – you name it.
[Here](https://youtu.be/zMFWr4eSBQI) is a teenage guitarist prodigy
[Here](https://youtu.be/GJu_lsb2oVQ) is a kid who is largely considered a rap prodigy
[Drummer](https://youtu.be/NKN36aS2uvI)
[Another guitarist](https://youtu.be/q17ER-yee6M) (edit; whoops this is the same kid as above. There’s plenty more though)
They’re everywhere, Google “kid who’s really good at X”
Rock and Rap *tend to be* simpler genres. Not saying there aren’t exceptions, as there certainly are, but for maybe 80-90% of popular Rock Bands they just play some simple chords, and the vocals are often looser with some distortion that helps mask imperfections. Same with Rap, where there are definitely exceptions, but most keep the backing music and vocals pretty standard.
This results in upcoming child prodigies who are only beginning to learn their instrument of choice getting pushed towards more complex genres (i.e. classical, jazz, etc.) by the adults in their life as a way to both develop their skill and show off their talents.
The word child prodigy in music doesn’t match the dictionary definition of prodigy. It refers to someone who performs well enough to contend with those who have a higher age and much more experience.
Kriss Kross were commercially viable hip-hop artists at the ages of 12 and 13. Lil Bow Wow released his first commercial rap album at 13. I’m sure there are more recent examples.
Latest Answers