Eli5: Why did civilizations such as the Pre Dorset, Thule, and Inuit not migrate south if their environments were so harsh and extreme?

562 views

I read a few articles where some of these civilizations main focus was keeping warm because they were located so far north. So why would they not migrate more south?

In: 661

20 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

Because moving is a lot harder than just adapting these civilizations had infrastructure knowledge of landmarks and rivers and just a better understanding of the flora and fauna in the area a lot of ppl didn’t want to just upend there lives and risk death for the small possibility of fortune when the resources and risk weren’t really worth it also if they did find an empty region nearby there was probably a good reason it was empty from other residents to dangerous predators/flora/weather also the logistics of a mass move would be horrifying to an old world ruler who couldn’t just email a go to plan or easily guide their ppl on such a vast journey to uncharted areas than there’s the nightmare of rebuilding all that necessary infrastructure from temples “hospitals”(or whatever was close for one) defenses of some kind farms or even designated waste and reliving areas literally think back to the trail of tears though the move was by force the act of marching there killed 1,000s and many more died on arrival as they had to completely reestablish themselves with minimal resources so yeah individuals may have left but any sort of mass move was functionally impossible without a couple 100 dying on the way

You are viewing 1 out of 20 answers, click here to view all answers.