eli5: why did soldiers in pre ww1 wars have a “turn based” or organized battle?

875 views

This is probably false to some extent because I get this perception mainly from movies and other media, but did soldiers in old wars line up in formations exposing themselves and take turns to fire? If so, why?

Edit: Ty for all the detailed responses guys! I had one more question- wouldn’t it make more sense for them to spread out or take cover while fighting?

In: 2518

14 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

One thing that I haven’t seen commented yet is that a large well organized group of soldiers in brightly colored uniforms marching to the beat of a drum not even flinching as you fire into their ranks getting closer to you is absolutely terrifying. We need to remember that war isn’t about killing the most people. It’s about getting the otherside to quit with as little casualties sustained as possible. People are really afraid of a fight 99% of the time. If you have a really well organized regiment that is trained enough to outwardly pretend to not be scared the otherside sees this confidence and it’s terrifying. This is why the British was so adamant that even in ww1 their officers “should never duck” if the enemy thinks you are unwavering they will run first. They will think you’re willing to fight to the death. Why? Because I just shot the guy in front of you and all you did is unflinchingly step over him to the same beat you were marching already. Now I’m reloading and you are closing the distance making your next shot more effective than mine range wise. Plus if you’re that well hardened and organized you’re probably a crack of a shot too. I’m fucked. You’re whole regiment is moving fast enough to halve the distance I shot at first by the time I’m reloaded. Best to just turn tail now.

You are viewing 1 out of 14 answers, click here to view all answers.