Was just reading on pre 20th century amputations and how they strived to be as fast as possible, cutting through bone and all.
Why didn’t they just amputate at the joint, like a butcher cuts pork or beef? That would have been way faster than sawing off though bone.
In: 8
Simply, cutting bone breaks bone, opens it for infections.
Cutting flesh away and then sawing through joints was way safer, and encouraged survivability.
Latest Answers