Cars use gasoline but jets use something closer to diesel, maybe kerosene, that’s less combustible. Wouldn’t they need a _more_ volatile or explosive fuel to get the most thrust for performance?
In: Engineering
jet engines can run on anything the produces heat, the soviets built one that ran on coal dust.
Diesel engines are always more efficient that petrol engines. Which means less fuel consumed per kilometer, which would imply less weight of fuel carried, which automatically means even more miles per gallon.
Timing is everything. You don’t want fuel to just combust, you want it to stay unexploded until the exact moment you need it.
Otherwise, your engine suffers from Premature Detonation, better known as knocking. It severely reduces engine efficiency.
Of course, coming up with fuels that cum … uhh … combust exactly on command is really hard. That’s why the stuff is so expensive, and why normal cars don’t use it. But with fighter jets, especially with a military budget, that’s less of an issue.
Latest Answers