How are torsion siege engines any different from their flexion-based counterparts?

268 views

I’ve been recently reading about ballistæ (and their many relatives!), and I’ve come across the assertion that early such weapons were tension-based (like any ordinary bow) while more advanced ones would work akin to a crossbow (torsion-based).

My question is: how the heck do the two differ after all? I can see that the energy-storage mechanism is fundamentally the same (pulled elastic string held back), and I thought it was about the different ways you could pull the string itself, but then I had a look at the Wiki page of the oxybeles (supposedly tension engine), which looks EXACTLY like a torsion ballista. Besides – don’t some crossbows get their string pulled by hand? Are those torsion weapons too?

Bonus: [these](https://www.stormthecastle.com/catapult/images/oxybeles-drawing1.jpg) two [images](https://www.stormthecastle.com/catapult/images/ballista-drawing1.jpg) attempt to explain the concept; I still don’t get it. Can anyone please explain it to me?

Thank you!

In: 8

5 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

The pulled string *isn’t* elastic. It transfers the force to (and from, when released) the bow or the twisted (torsioned) ropes.

You are viewing 1 out of 5 answers, click here to view all answers.