How are torsion siege engines any different from their flexion-based counterparts?

266 views

I’ve been recently reading about ballistæ (and their many relatives!), and I’ve come across the assertion that early such weapons were tension-based (like any ordinary bow) while more advanced ones would work akin to a crossbow (torsion-based).

My question is: how the heck do the two differ after all? I can see that the energy-storage mechanism is fundamentally the same (pulled elastic string held back), and I thought it was about the different ways you could pull the string itself, but then I had a look at the Wiki page of the oxybeles (supposedly tension engine), which looks EXACTLY like a torsion ballista. Besides – don’t some crossbows get their string pulled by hand? Are those torsion weapons too?

Bonus: [these](https://www.stormthecastle.com/catapult/images/oxybeles-drawing1.jpg) two [images](https://www.stormthecastle.com/catapult/images/ballista-drawing1.jpg) attempt to explain the concept; I still don’t get it. Can anyone please explain it to me?

Thank you!

In: 8

5 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

In your images the “Oxybeles” is powered by the flexing of its bows and the “Ballista” is powered by the TWISTING of the upright members colored gray.

You are viewing 1 out of 5 answers, click here to view all answers.