With reference to Archie Battersbee case, the boy is essentially dead, with his life supported by machines keeping him alive. How do people then die in hospital from much less smaller problems, let’s say liver failure or kindey failure or pancreatitis. Why can’t we plug them to a machine that acts like the failing organ keeping them alive until they can get a donor?
In: 3
People die from smaller problems because we are merciful.
If you really wanted to, you could hook someone up to a continual renal replacement system that does that the kidneys do, set up extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation to keep the blood oxygenated if the lungs can’t, a left-ventricular assistance device can keep a heart that isn’t remotely strong enough to pump blood on its own more-or-less working, parenteral nutrition can dump nutrients into your blood to replace all the normal mechanisms of eating, and we can keep you floating in antibiotics because all of this is just asking for infection.
But *why?*
At some point, you’re not fixing a human being who will get up and have any quality of life, you’re just keeping them from being technically dead and praying they’re not aware of what’s going on in any way under the sedation. And if you’re that messed up, donation’s not a fix.
Latest Answers