You can notice something is genetic long before you can identify _what_ gene, geneS, or specific combination of genes (that individually do nothing significant), or *epigenetic* modifications (distinct from genes), or *combination* of genetics and epigenetics leads to conditions. Add to that, you can’t just compare two individuals, one with and one without, because there will also be *thousands* of other differences to mix in– you would be aiming to identify the cause behind *one* of these differences, independently, *somehow.*
Biology is fun, but it’s a very messy science and it’s often difficult trying to explain things definitively.
Noticing ADHD/autistic/other-condition parents more frequently have kids with a similar condition though, or related observations? Easy.
If it is genetic, it is caused by a combination of genes, and we don’t really know which ones. If it were just one gene, it would be really easy to determine, and also would have been acted on by selection long ago. Most complex traits (intelligence, attention span) and even many simple ones (height) are caused by many different genes acting in different ways. All the easy genetic wins have already happened, basically; if one gene did something unambigously good, it lived, and all the others died out. We’re now left with genes that point in different directions for different things, so selection on them is difficult.
It’s not entirely genetic is also highly environmentally influenced. I recommend the book scattered and pretty much anything else is ever written by Gabor Maté. Bipolar disorder is, if anything, more genetically irritable and we have no blood test for that. In fact, we don’t have a blood test for any DSM diagnosis to my knowledge that doesn’t mean they’re not real or genetic. There are many non-genetic diseases for which we don’t have a blood test that doesn’t make them any less real.
Latest Answers