I read other posts, but none of them seemed to cover my main concern as password managers being a single point of failure.
What exactly is the difference of using **(A)** the same 25-long password for all my important logins (email, banks, personal documents), and **(B)**, a 25-long password as the master key to my password manager with different keys to my individual logins?
A malicious user would take the same amount of time to crack that 25-long password in my password manager and my bank account. In scenario A the attacker would crack the password and have access to my other logins (since they are all the same), and in scenario B the attacker would crack my password manager, therefore exposing all my other logins. So what exactly is the difference here?
I understand password managers help the general population in the sense of enforcing a stronger password. But if you already use a very strong password (i.e. 25 characters) for all your log-ins, I don’t really understand the difference to having a password manager, where I would use that same password as the master key, which technically leads to the same catastrophic scenario.
Help me understand.
In: 5
Do you trust every website that you use your strong password for? There are lots of sites that still store passwords insecurely. It’s possible that these sites could be hacked and then your password that you use for important things like banking is now in the open.
A password manager uses a different password for each site, meaning if one gets leaked through a hack, then only that one site is vulnerable.
Latest Answers