If jobs are “lost” because robots are doing more work, why is it a problem that the population is aging and there are fewer in “working age”? Shouldn’t the two effects sort of cancel each other out?
In: 13038
Robots are only able to do simple jobs on their own like assembly line jobs but we’re decades out from having a replacement for skilled workers. What most people are referring to is the massive shortage of skilled trades workers in field like brick laying & masonry that’s going to come in the next few years as half the workforce ages into retirement without enough replacements.
Latest Answers