If jobs are “lost” because robots are doing more work, why is it a problem that the population is aging and there are fewer in “working age”? Shouldn’t the two effects sort of cancel each other out?

722 views

If jobs are “lost” because robots are doing more work, why is it a problem that the population is aging and there are fewer in “working age”? Shouldn’t the two effects sort of cancel each other out?

In: 13038

28 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

It’s worth nothing we’ve been doing this for centuries. The UK started industrialisation in the 18th century and since then we’ve been removing Jobs.

It’s still a problem but nothing we haven’t handled before.

You are viewing 1 out of 28 answers, click here to view all answers.