IIRC, there was an episode of South Park where they drew Mohammad as a background character (a part of the Super Friends). No one cared or complained because they did not draw attention to it.
In short, if you draw an Arabic looking fellow who is supposed to Mohammad, but do not mention that that is Mohammad, you could get away with it.
Images of Mohammad aren’t universally prohibited. I’m not an expert on Islamic theology, but there are major doctrinal differences between branches, which of course sometimes become violent. In this case, Sunni Islam is strictly against depicting Mohammed, but Shia Islam is not. Disrespectful depictions like caricature are forbidden, but showing him in a context of veneration or of education can be acceptable.
Historically, some Islamic schools of thought made any depiction of any living thing forbidden. Obviously that makes “no this guy is actually Ahmed!” a useless defense.
Unless I’m mistaken, in Islam it’s equally prohibited to depict ANY PROPHET, not just Mohammed. Similarly, Judaism to a lesser extent prohibits the depiction of any kind of visual recreation of biblical personages inside a synogogue. If you ever visited a conservative or orthodox temple, the inner sanctuary will have geometric shapes, or abstract architectures in the center because in essence the idea is that you use your imagination to imagine the scene and stories and that’s far better than any earthly painting or statue. Not to mention the whole idolatry thing being a sin.
Latest Answers