Also, if time does exist, doesn’t there have to be a definable beginning or end? Otherwise it’s just infinity which to me suggests the absense of time.
I partially read “The Discoverers” by Daniel Boorstin several years ago and he discussed how different societies conceptualized of time and how they kept time. And it has had me wondering ever since. Then I started exploring Zen Buddhism which emphasizes the present moment as the only tangible reality, along with the illusion of the ego, which only furthered my questioning.
EDIT – I am aware that the concept of time is based on the revolution of the Earth and it’s moon. However, that is just how humans conceive of time. That’s not proof of time itself.
EDIT 2 – The explanation of timespace and relativity is the best from an objective point of view. No matter how much I read or watch, it was always a bit hard to grasp but it makes sense in terms of change or entropy. The reality of time being flexible vs the human perception of time being linear and unchangeable gets closer to what I am asking.
EDIT 3 – “Exist” is a tricky word.
In: 7871
First of all *time* is a word assigned many types of interpretations in many languages through history. Often *times* people are hung up on archaic concepts that doesn’t have any consequence today. Time is not essentially a construct of it’s own, but rather a property and consequence how the universe is constructed with space and energy. A fundamental physical constant of our universe is entropy.
Entropy is a one way ticket dealing with change. We see this established in the second law of thermodynamics as the loss of transfer of energy in a system in one direction.
In this sense, time is a property of certain relationships within space. Unless you are a photon of course, which doesn’t experience time at all.
Latest Answers