There won’t be a “real” number bajillion until we decide to define the term in relation to a particular number. Right now it’s defined as “an indeterminate but exceedingly large number”.
Before someone decided to define a googol as a googol (Google it if you don’t know :P), there was no real number “googol”. Same for googolplex. Not that those numbers didn’t exist, but they hadn’t been defined in those terms yet. Maybe someday “bajillion” will have a defined number associated with it, but currently it doesn’t.
Edit: spelling
Just because there is an infinite number of possibilities, does not mean that everything is a possibility. To give an example, there are an infinite amount of numbers between 1 and 2, but there is not one in that range that has a value greater than 2.
Likewise, even if every number was named, it does not guarantee a number named bajillion
I think he means that if you were to name every single number, it would be like the infinite monkeys with typewriters where every single letter combination would have to be used.
The problem with this is that you could have a system with some kind of rule like every single number is called (n+any random letter) increasing forever.
A millionj, a millionjj, a millionjjj, a millionjjjj, etc. infinitely without using any other letters.
An infinite set does not mean all possibilities are represented. There are an infinite number of even numbers, does not mean the set must contain odd numbers.
You could remove the letter b from the alphabet and still have an infinite number of names to represent the infinite numbers and because there is no letter b you could never name one ‘bajillion’.
Latest Answers