On many cases such as you describe, there is a way in the company bylaws to resolve this. An example is the “double ended shotgun”. Person A offers $100/share. Person B can accept that offer (A pays B and A then owns all the shares) OR they can choose to instead reverse the buyout and choose to buy A’s shares at the price A offered (so B end up with all the shares). This approach forces A to offer a fair price, even overpaying so that B doesn’t switch around the shotgun.
Most companies that start off with this sort of ownership structure will have these sorts of bylaws. If not, there’s no way to resolve it.
Latest Answers