kurzgesagt has a video about how, according to our understanding of physics, information cannot be destroyed. It’s in this video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWO-cvGETRQ
They explained it as that if you have a piece of paper with writing on it, and you burned it, but then you collected every atom that once came from the paper, and measured their every property, you can perfectly recreate the paper and the writing, because apparently the atoms themselves retain the information about the paper. I’m curious about this concept, because to me, this sounds pretty unbelievable, because wouldn’t there be randomness that gets in the way of reconstructing the paper? Wouldn’t the information get lost in the noise at some point, and become too ambiguous or indistinguishable? Does this idea work for everything that can store information? For example, of you have a hard drive, which a file was overwritten, where does that information go? Are they still somehow stored away within the atoms of the hard drive? How would you, in theory, reconstruct it? Same questions with an SSD, if the cells containing electrons that make up the information in an SSD change states as they are overwritten, where does that information go? In the far far future, could forensics teams, in theory, use this principle to recover any data from any computer, regardless of what was done to it?
In: Physics
It’s not so much that it sounds unbelievable, it’s that it sounds technologically impossible. Not actually impossible, at least not from a theoretical perspective, just impossible to do with any known or imaginable technology. In other words, we lack and will almost certainly always lack the technology required to reconstruct any macro object atom by atom after it’s undergone a significant transformation (like melting or burning). In theory, all the information still exists, it’s just transformed and almost certainly dissipated throughout the local environment so that (to us) it is indistinguishable from noise.
Take the rewriting of an SSD for example. Changing the memory’s medium requires energy, and the amount of energy used and how that energy is dissipated as heat in a specific way is based on exactly what was done to the memory cells. The way that heat interacts with the local environment depends on how it was emitted, which (again) depends on exactly what was done to produce that heat. If we had sufficiently sensitive instruments (we don’t) and sufficiently complex computational tools (we don’t), we could measure the local environment precisely at a given time and work backward, step by step, to determine exactly how that bit of heat was produced. This would tell us exactly how the memory cells were overwritten, so we could (again, in theory) reconstruct exactly what was contained in those memory cells.
The issue is there’s simply too much information in even the smallest macro system, and we lack even the bluntest measuring tools that would be needed to have a chance at reconstructing information from just moments ago, let alone keep working backwards. Is it possible we could develop some sufficiently advanced technology sometime in the future to do these sorts of things? Possibly for very small objects in tightly controlled conditions, but not likely in any real world scenario.
Latest Answers