Let’s turn that around. What would UN be if they could stop any conflict? For that they would have to have control over US, China, Russia, etc. For that US (and China+Russia) would have to give their weapons to UN, or control of weapons or similar. They would effectively be world government.
But why they arent? US doesn’t want. Or China. Or Russia. Or France, Britain, etc. Single example: US doesn’t want that foreign power can decide what US does. Could you imagine Xi handing control of China to foreigners?
Why veto right for Security counsil? How else would US and Russia joined UN? What would they get from it? We live in real world where people (and countries) with power want to keep that power. “Yep. We (UN) can start a war and attack another country in name of humanity and good, if all agrees. Of course that doesn’t apply to us (US, China, Russia).”
About not escalating. “Fuck it! I’m insane and in corner!!! If you come near I’ll blow whole world and you know I can.”
I don’t think they’re afraid to do something, I think we’re talking about complete destruction of Russia and millions of other people in Europe/Asian and possibly North America, I don’t think anyone wants that on their conscious. The situation right now is pretty much David vs Goliath, except, nato is supplying David with a rocket launcher instead of his sling shot. At least that’s what I think in my very naive mind.
There was plenty of provocation on Ukraine’s side.
Us backed coup in 2014. Ongoing civil war in Donbass and ethnic cleansing. 13k dead so far. Bioweapons in us illegal biolabs.
I will be buried in negative karma and people replying telling me it’s propaganda. And it will sadden me to believe people are so biased and have such a little scope to analyze reality.
Stay manipulated, kings.
Latest Answers