The second amendment is another deterrent here. Having an armed populace that may not want to follow your new dictatorship is not ideal.
I expect comments like “a pistol or AR can’t beat a tank/missle/fighter jet”, which is certainly true. When every home is or may be armed it takes a lot of resources (ie: soldiers willing to die for your coup if they barge into the wrong house unprepared) to overcome that. You can exterminate a large city I suppose to create fear, but you still have to try and disarm the citizens in the USA if you really want to take over.
This is why the 2nd amendment is important. I’m not against gun control, but I am against repealing this amendment or otherwise fully outlawing gun ownership as we need this deterrent.
Just my opinion – YMMV
If no one has said it: the sheer volume of armed civilians that wouldn’t put up with that sort of nonsense. Really, we just have to not obey their orders. Maybe stop delivering their food and power. The military can’t function without support. If they just up and had a coup without some sort of reason, the populous wouldn’t stand for it.
It’s precisely because the US military is so powerful that pulling off a coup is a risky endeavor not worth the trouble.
Say you, as a general, has garnered enough loyalty for your command to take over District of Columbia and force the President to resign and the Congress to acknowledge you as new President… now what? You’ve got the rest of the military gunning for you and, if you’re not outright besieged on Washington DC, then you’ll be stuck in a drawn out civil war fought between your largely illegitimate government and US military plus whatever ally they could gather up worldwide. Your immediate neighbors will condemn your actions and your choices of friends are an entire ocean and a frozen desert away.
Even taking over nukes won’t work since the US didn’t put them all in one basket and, more importantly, nukes are kinda counterintuitive when the goal is to instigate a coup.
So unless you can get the entire military behind you, it’s just not worth the trouble trying to instigate a coup when you could just run for President or a cabinet office after your service.
There is also a deep cultural tradition in the US that rejects this. Some countries’ militaries exist for internal security while the US is strictly outward facing and historically being very small after wars. It also helps George Washington really set the tone too:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newburgh_Conspiracy
Latest Answers