Watched the Apollo 11 famous footage of the launch and the camera perspective was from the ground focused on the ascending rocket. When it came time for staging and dropping the first stage, we can clearly see cutoff of rocket motors, separation and ignition of the second stage.
One thing that puzzled me always was the first stage as it falls away is seen trailing vapor, residue from its shut off engines. This reasonably has to be residual unburned oxidizer/propellant. its enough of a plume to be visible even 30+ seconds later it is still leaking away as the second stage carries the rocket further away and away.
Im asking bc every ounce, every bit of weight is calculated for and certainly fuel is no exception. Why lug the fuel up there just to shut the engines off presumably early and not burn it. Any reason for this inefficiency?
EDIT: Including link to video. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhTvadtW2dc](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhTvadtW2dc) Begin watching at time 36:38
In: 113
Right, that’s one of the points I made. They are “tuned” for performance at specific altitudes. In space, you need a larger bell to achieve efficient propulsion.
At some altitude, with identical engines, you get more “power” out of a bigger bell than you ever could with a smaller bell.
Latest Answers