Some article talking about that: [https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-04558-7#:~:text=According%20to%20theoretical%20physicist%20Carlo,of%20a%20universally%20ticking%20clock](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-04558-7#:~:text=According%20to%20theoretical%20physicist%20Carlo,of%20a%20universally%20ticking%20clock).
I really don’t understand how time can be an illusion. I mean that I know that what I’ve done before is done and I can’t change it.
So how can we say that time is an illusion?
​
thanks
In: 0
Whole thing appears to be one of those “Let me present something in the most misleading and ~~borderline~~ downright inaccurate way possible”.
The whole thing reads like a pop sci article, which it *is*. Pop sci articles love doing that.
If the actual scientist’s actual claims are like those of the article, then they are very controversial at best and more than likely just very wrong. Either that or a terrible abuse of the English language and meanings of words.
Latest Answers