I was looking into going on some light off-road trips in my new car, and while browing related info, I ran into this a lot: that all serious off-road vehicles require a locking differential.
My understanding of the locking differential is that the differential can be locked, meaning the left and right wheel are required to spin at the same rate. That is useful for situations where one wheel might not have traction, which would normally (without locking differential) cause it to spin and get the most torque. Locking differential prevents this by forcing both wheels to spin at the same rate, preventing the no-traction wheel from getting all the available torque. This much, I think I understand.
What I don’t understand is, how is that better than a traditional AWD system, where the car can decide which wheel gets the torque? In my mind, this is even better because as soon as the car detects loss of traction, it will cut the torque, achieving basically what the locking differential does without the downsides (like worse corner handling). For example, my new car, a Subaru Outback, supposedly comes with this kind of AWD system that can distribute torque as needed.
So my question is, why is a locking differential better than just having a normal AWD?
In: Technology
I can make this an easier explanation than most
Lets say you have
1) Front wheel Drive
2) An open differential
If your front left tire is in snow and your front right tire is on pavement, you’re not moving anywhere because, in an open differential, the tire with the *lowest* traction (least resistance) will spin.
With a locking differential, both wheels will spin and you can get yourself unstuck.
Latest Answers