What is the “paradox of tolerance” and is it legit?
In: 1208
>Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.
So there’s a lot of back & forth in this section and it has to be considered within the context that Karl Popper wrote this in. His Open Society book was first published in 1945 shortly after the Nazi regime ended. If you read it as “a tolerant democratic society must be intolerant towards thugs with guns who refuse to participate in the democratic process”, then yes it is legit.
Unfortunately the recent Internet revival of that phrase is using it in bad faith as “it’s okay if I am intolerant because my opponents disagree with me”. Fortunately there is a Popper quote for that one as well – something he wrote 30 years later:
>There can be no human society without conflict: such a society would be a society not of friends but of ants.”
Latest Answers