What practical use does the ‘overtype’ function on a computer serve? It honestly seems more annoying than helpful

545 views

What practical use does the ‘overtype’ function on a computer serve? It honestly seems more annoying than helpful

In: 26

21 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

Have you ever filled in a form using a word processor like Microsoft Word? If the field you’re filling in is within some sort of box, or on a line, you will notice that the new text pushes the symbols afterwards across the page, and it messes up the entire form.

Instead, you can “insert” the text in place by replacing the character underneath. This maintains the format of the document but allows you to type freely.

Nowadays, it isn’t as useful for most people, but this was a very common issue a few decades back.

Anonymous 0 Comments

Have you ever filled in a form using a word processor like Microsoft Word? If the field you’re filling in is within some sort of box, or on a line, you will notice that the new text pushes the symbols afterwards across the page, and it messes up the entire form.

Instead, you can “insert” the text in place by replacing the character underneath. This maintains the format of the document but allows you to type freely.

Nowadays, it isn’t as useful for most people, but this was a very common issue a few decades back.

Anonymous 0 Comments

Have you ever filled in a form using a word processor like Microsoft Word? If the field you’re filling in is within some sort of box, or on a line, you will notice that the new text pushes the symbols afterwards across the page, and it messes up the entire form.

Instead, you can “insert” the text in place by replacing the character underneath. This maintains the format of the document but allows you to type freely.

Nowadays, it isn’t as useful for most people, but this was a very common issue a few decades back.

Anonymous 0 Comments

Have you ever filled in a form using a word processor like Microsoft Word? If the field you’re filling in is within some sort of box, or on a line, you will notice that the new text pushes the symbols afterwards across the page, and it messes up the entire form.

Instead, you can “insert” the text in place by replacing the character underneath. This maintains the format of the document but allows you to type freely.

Nowadays, it isn’t as useful for most people, but this was a very common issue a few decades back.

Anonymous 0 Comments

Have you ever filled in a form using a word processor like Microsoft Word? If the field you’re filling in is within some sort of box, or on a line, you will notice that the new text pushes the symbols afterwards across the page, and it messes up the entire form.

Instead, you can “insert” the text in place by replacing the character underneath. This maintains the format of the document but allows you to type freely.

Nowadays, it isn’t as useful for most people, but this was a very common issue a few decades back.

Anonymous 0 Comments

As well as what’s already been said, typewriters use this feature to create different characters.

Eg, L + – gives Ł

Anonymous 0 Comments

As well as what’s already been said, typewriters use this feature to create different characters.

Eg, L + – gives Ł

Anonymous 0 Comments

Nobody? Well yes, it’s a legacy function. But the thing you need to remember is that 30+ years ago, there were plenty of computers that didn’t have a mouse, much less the GUI elements that we’re accustomed to. Under those conditions, positioning your cursor and then selectively typing over existing text was probably a much more efficient way to edit.

Anonymous 0 Comments

As well as what’s already been said, typewriters use this feature to create different characters.

Eg, L + – gives Ł

Anonymous 0 Comments

Nobody? Well yes, it’s a legacy function. But the thing you need to remember is that 30+ years ago, there were plenty of computers that didn’t have a mouse, much less the GUI elements that we’re accustomed to. Under those conditions, positioning your cursor and then selectively typing over existing text was probably a much more efficient way to edit.