What sets the length of a courtroom trial? How does the judge determine what’s a “right” amount of time so it doesn’t go forever?

709 views

Seems like this must be a very judge-dependent and judge-controlled thing? I imagine lawyers must want to try to throw in the kitchen sink and have tons and tons of witnesses going down every rabbit hole, but the judge has to say no to some things.

Do they set a time limit based on the complexity of the topic? Do they make a gut feel call about whether any particular witness actually adds new information and say “that’s enough”?

Can the judge “game” this and favor one side (intentionally or unintentionally if they don’t believe the side saying that more complexity and duration of witnesses is needed, like for example in a complicated technical case?)

I read about the judicial system being swamped, but are judges using time limits to help move things along better?

In: 2116

21 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

By the time the judge is making a decision like this, all the evidence that is going to be presented is known by both sides, and by the judge. The amount and complexity of that evidence is a pretty good indicator for how long the trial should take.

You are viewing 1 out of 21 answers, click here to view all answers.