There are many Wikipedia or Fandom Wiki articles that go into so much detail that, in some cases, it tells you more about the story than even watching or reading the original content could tell you. Why is this allowed, and when does it cross the line to becoming an issue?
In: 9
Commentary/review is part of fair use. Especially if it is transformative – and in your example it is being changed into a written explanation of a visual medium. If a copyright holder believes in good faith it is an infringement or a market substitute (reading the wiki prevents people from seeing the film), they can try to use the courts to stop them.
Latest Answers