why are most suburban houses in the US built with wood, instead of bricks and mortar?

849 views

why are most suburban houses in the US built with wood, instead of bricks and mortar?

In: 5

34 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

St. Louis, where I am from, was a huge source for bricks. Most of our older homes are brick.

See the excellent film by Bill Streeter [Brick By Chance or Fortune.](https://youtu.be/rrTAKgL6upw)

Anonymous 0 Comments

I see many explanations but they seem to ignore that there are other countries where you have brick and concrete, even in earthquake zones.

Anonymous 0 Comments

This tends to be asked by Europeans. At least in Canada, besides costs, there is a need for much greater insulation than in the EU. It is not unusual in Canada to experience lows of -30C (at least for a few days) and highs about 33C, so a swing of around 65C. That means houses have to be warm in winter and relatively easy to cool in summer. (Even without air conditioning, a well insulated house is much more comfortable on a hot day).

This is very hard to accomplish with bricks and mortar. My house, for example is Insulated Concrete Forms (ICF) and extremely well insulated, but it cost about 2x what the wood equivalent would have cost.

Anonymous 0 Comments

In Arizona before the 80s/90s most houses were built with slump block (fired clay that is slightly rounded on edges)