“Actor” is gender neutral whereas “actress” is specific to a female actor.
There is a long, complicated explanation (or perhaps theory is a better word) as to why, but there is something to be said about a defined sense of identity and the need, by some, to be recognized. Sometimes people will create a space/identity for themselves through a term that fits them, whereas other times, they do this by creating a term they *don’t* fit (actor vs. actress — “She and I are actors, but she is a woman and I am not, therefore, I shall refer to her as an actress!”)
Another example I have always thought was funny is “dude” and “dudette.” Dude is absolutely gender neutral (unless otherwise defined by a gendered pronoun like “he is a dude” or “she is a dude”) whereas dudette is not.
It is also worth noting gendered languages exist and the fact English is a bit of a mash-up of multiple different languages, so it makes sense some gendered terminology would be adopted as well. Not to mention the history of the English language and it’s development over time just in general.
Either way, the whole gendered professional title thing seems a bit sexist, as if to imply certain positions and professions can only be held by certain genders (which is silly, especially considering gender in and of itself is a social construct)… Which is WHY the whole purpose of my comment was to inform or remind whoever reads this that the professional title “actor” IS gender neutral (and there is no reason to refer to someone as an actress unless they prefer it — regardless of gender, I say).
I hope this comment sufficiently meets the standards not met in my previous comment and thus, will not be removed. Thank you.
Latest Answers