Because there are much better places in Texas to put wind turbines, and until those places are full there’s basically no reason to put them anywhere else. There’s a ton of significantly cheaper land in places like west texas that will produce much more power.
Here’s a [map](https://windexchange.energy.gov/maps-data/325) of wind speeds that can give you a decent idea of where it’s best to do wind power. Note that Austin’s wind speed isn’t particularly impressive.
Edit: Likely has very little to do with “oil presence in the state” since there’s still a decent number of solar installations around Austin
I mean;
1) Austin itself isn’t actually that good for wind energy in comparison to the rest of the state, as it’s in a bit of a valley. The raised hills *around* Austin are considerably better for wind energy generation. Put a different way, if you were a power company wanting to invest in wind energy production, why would you not put it in a more ideal location for generating wind energy?
2) If Texas were a country, their wind generation capacity with current installed wind energy would be like…5th or 6th in the world. The oil money isn’t stopping renewable investment, and if anything all that oil money is *accelerating* growth of renewables.
Edit: See [NREL’s](https://windexchange.energy.gov/files/u/visualization/image/Texas_Wind_Land_Based_WTK100-01.jpg) map of wind speeds, which essentially map directly to wind energy capacity. Austin is garbage in comparison to the surrounding area.
Latest Answers