Why are there so many olympic events for swimming and only one for weightlifting?

948 viewsOther

it seems a little arbitrary having medals for both freestyle and also backstroke, butterfly, etc. Like, in track and field there’s not a 100m “running backwards” event. Why are there so many medals for swimming? Who decided it was that important relative to other forms of physical endeavor?

It also seems awkward in comparison to olympic weightlifting, which has TWO different lifts as part of a single event. I understand that they already bracket it by weight classes, but why not break it into a medal for the clean-and-jerk and another for the snatch? Or alternatively, add other events that test strength and precision?

I’m okay if the answer is just “that’s how it’s always been” and general path-dependence, but it seems a bit odd.

In: Other

13 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

There are arbitrary track events too, like hurdles. Swimming also has more degrees of freedom for movement. You can move up and down instead of just forwards and backwards. Adding degrees of freedom increases the number of possible movements exponentially. Not to mention, also using your arms.

You are viewing 1 out of 13 answers, click here to view all answers.