Why did invading armies seem to get stronger as the conquer more land?

938 views

Between attrition (lost in battle), needing to leave troops behind to control conquered territory, and longer supply lines, shouldn’t the armies have gotten significantly thinner and weaker.

In: 247

33 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

I would imagine there were a lot of “fight for us or we’ll kill you and your entire bloodline” moments. Kind of like that scene in ‘300’ where Xerxes offers Leonidas to be warlord of Greece if he surrendered. If any of these territories did surrender and choose to fight for their new leader, then you basically inherited a new army, and would probably only have to leave a few behind to fight off any dissidents.

You are viewing 1 out of 33 answers, click here to view all answers.