Depending on exactly where the building was, the quakes did shake *some* of the buildings more than building code required. (50% gravity where code requires withstanding 40% gravity.)
However, many buildings did not suffer 40%+ gravity and their collapse means the buildings were not built to code or were older than the code.
In Syria, many of the buildings were also damaged by the Syrian Civil War and simply never completely repaired, which added to building collapses.
Because building codes in Turkey, if they’re even being strictly followed, weren’t updated until quite recently. Most buildings older than about 20 years aren’t reinforced with steel, so they can’t flex. [More info here.](https://www.npr.org/2023/02/07/1154816277/turkey-syria-earthquake-why-buildings-collapsed)
The earthquake scale is logarithmic. That means M6 is 10 times stronger than M5 and 100 times stronger than M4. Turkey actually had 4 earthquakes in short time, two nearing 7 and two nearing 8.
Only the most reinforced buildings can survive a magnitude 8 earthquake. So the answer is that the earthquake was simply too strong.
Depending on exactly where the building was, the quakes did shake *some* of the buildings more than building code required. (50% gravity where code requires withstanding 40% gravity.)
However, many buildings did not suffer 40%+ gravity and their collapse means the buildings were not built to code or were older than the code.
In Syria, many of the buildings were also damaged by the Syrian Civil War and simply never completely repaired, which added to building collapses.
Because building codes in Turkey, if they’re even being strictly followed, weren’t updated until quite recently. Most buildings older than about 20 years aren’t reinforced with steel, so they can’t flex. [More info here.](https://www.npr.org/2023/02/07/1154816277/turkey-syria-earthquake-why-buildings-collapsed)
Latest Answers