Why did the US government bail out the banks in the financial crisis of 2008? Why didn’t they just give the money directly to the people that were hurt? Don’t bailouts just incentivize the mismanagement of customer funds?

Question

Instead of bailing out the institutions, why didn’t the government just let them fail and give the money directly to the people hurt by the bank’s mismanagement? Why were the banks’ protected? Doesn’t this kind of protection incentivize banks to act recklessly in the future?

In: Economics

Answer 1

Leverage. The amount of money people were owed by banks in trouble dwarfed the rescue by two orders of magnitude. 

Much more bang for the buck – and more chance of it working smoothly – to keep the institutions alive.