This may not apply to all airlines, or apply to today’s world, but I was watching a video on Britannia 226A crash from 1999. In the video, they mentioned that the pilots were under pressure to land, so they wouldn’t have to explain to their bosses why they landed with less than the minimum amount of fuel required.
If a plane takes off, has to abandon a landing attempt, or complete an extra go around, or has to stay in a holding pattern, or has to divert… but they land safely without incident nor issue, why would that be an issue? What else could the pilots do?
Edit to add the answer (thank you for all of the replies, everyone! I misunderstood entirely what the video was attempting to convey): There are aviation safety boards with strict rules and landing with low fuel is grounds for a report and an investigation into the flight, so the safety boards can find the root cause for why the flight did not have an adequate amount of fuel on landing. The pilots may get into trouble if the investigation finds they were at fault, but it is more geared towards safety and attributing a root cause for the issue to make a low fuel event less likely in the future.
In: 707
As per regulatory requirements you do need to have something called final reserve which is 30minuts holding 1500ft above destination aerodrome. This fuel cannot be used in normal operations nor cannot be planned to be used. This is your last resort if shit hit the fan and absolutely everything goes wrong.
This fuel is quite critical. If you just *expect* you will land below final reservers you need to report it to air traffic controllers (with mayday call). Appropriate action would be to land asap at the nearest suitable airport to refuel. An investigation might be opened.
Here is an example: https://avherald.com/h?article=454af355
Latest Answers