You’re buying cheap printers. Spend some coin and you can get a great printer, yes even inkjet, that works flawlessly and requires little maintenance. Brother monochrome lasers are great, but if you want to print photos inkjet is still the way to go. A decent midrange Epson photo printer requires nearly no maintenance and will self-clean the print head, keep the lines from drying up.
Colour laser printers are pretty sweet too, but expensive and have a lot of consumable parts.
Because the profit incentives aren’t there to make it better, most of the margin is made on the ink, which, the crappier your printer is the more likely you are to let dry out.
personally i’ve found that….just use the library is my preferred method of printing. society puts too much emphasis on “this is yours (it might suck)” and not enough on “this is ours (and it works)”
Maybe I print way less than the average person but I just dont see the value in owning a thing that, by all accounts, seem to be more of a nuisance
One of the challenges that home printers may face is the network environment where they are set up. When setting up a printer on a home network, to make it easy on consumers, the instructions are to just connect it to the network, whether wireless or wired. One of the issues that I used to have (think mid-2000s) is that the computers would “lose” the printer and have a hard time connecting. I found that the issue was resolved by setting the printer to a static IP address inside my home network. That meant that the computers always knew “where” on the network the printer was even if the network was restarted. This does require a bit of network management, so I understand why the instructions don’t recommend it.
I honestly don’t know if this is still a problem. I have been setting static addresses for my printers for close to 20 years now.
Latest Answers