Is it necessary for public servants to have citizen financed mansions? Couldn’t their private security protect them at their own homes?
In: 2
[deleted]
This was the case for most states prior to the Civil War. Governors found their own housing, and sometimes were compensated if they had to move to the capital city.
However, as the country grew, government became more extensive. Some states began to set aside special housing for their chief executives to make it easier for government officials, dignitaries, lobbyists, journalists, and citizens to meet with the governor or their staff immediately upon taking office. This made orderly transition of power considerably simpler. Once this started, other states didn’t want to seem provincial or unimportant, so nearly every state founded one. Over time, they became larger and more multipurpose, and sometimes more grand to reflect the importance of the executive power.
In the modern era, the needs of security are added to to the needs of convenience and most states prefer to house its governor in a ready-to-run facility. Some states, however, no longer maintain an official residence.
partly, its just eaiser to have an “offical” house that can be purpose built to be secure, as opposed to security having to up an move every few years and work out how to secure some random house in a random neighbourhood (and any security measures would likely annoy the neighbours, which is bad PR)
also, much like in the White House, a lot of that “mansion” is office space so the governor can fulfil his role in government. office rooms for the governors staff, briefing and conference rooms, a large hall to host events, etc.
> Is it necessary for public servants to have citizen-financed mansions?
No, but it is convenient. The executive residence is typically a place near the capitol, and while it does contain living quarters, it will generally will also have official offices, reception rooms for officially receiving guests, and similar things which allow an executive to do their job, not just relax in opulent splendor. They are functional buildings, and they provide an easy access to the capitol for somebody who might otherwise live hundreds of miles from it.
> Couldn’t their private security protect them at their own homes?
Uh… what private security? Not everyone who runs for office can afford that sort of thing. If you make it an unofficial requirement that they do so, you’ve then essentially said you cannot run for governor without being able to pay for that – especially as many gubernatorial salaries do not provide enough money to pay for such a thing.
The US states are kinda large and spread out. You are assuming that the governor originally lives near or in the capital city (usually the administrative and legislative center of the state). Why would that be true? And it would be rather difficult if ALL of these functions moved to where the governor lived every few years if/when a new governor is elected.
Then there are events that the governors host on behalf of the state.
And security is more than simply the protection of the person. There will be a lot of sensitive information stored, and moving into and out of the governor’s residence. So there also needs to be guards against espionage, power backups, evacuation routes etc etc involved. These are expensive to set up.
Finally, it isn’t always true that governors are multimillionaires who live in mansions prior to becoming governor.
It’s not about security. It’s about ease of access. The home of a high executive like a governor or president is going to be a place with people potentially coming and going all the time, perhaps even in the middle of the night.
It’s easy if they live in a kind of special building that’s half-home and half-office, that’s not just on some random street where all this traffic at all hours is going to bother the neighbors and potentially be difficult to access
A few things:
– the governor is likely not from the capital city, so they need a house there while in office
– security is easier if it’s always the same house with security set up vs. having to determine security needs every time an incoming governor buys/rents a house
– governors’ mansions are often the site of official state ceremonies, dinners, important meetings, repositories for state history
Because they can. No, it’s not necessary at all, but it’s a perk of office. Also, a lot of governor’s mansions aren’t actually residences for the governor. Many of them are historical buildings that are used for ceremonial functions and the governor actually lives in a private residence elsewhere.
Usually, the Governor’s Mansion is very much like the White House; sure, the Governor may live there, but it’s primarily where the governor’s day-to-day job is also done. It’s mostly made up of the administrative offices that are required for a governor to do their job, the headquarters of the state’s Executive Branch, as it were. Cabinet meetings, research, lawyers, the Press, situation room, etc. are all in the Governor’s Mansion (again, usually, not all states do things the same way). The Residence is there because having the governor live and work in the same place is *damn* convenient for just about everybody.
They also function as event halls, museums, cultural exchange centers, etc.
Latest Answers