Why do victims of violent crimes have to testify in front of their attacker?

374 viewsOther

I watch a lot of true crime shows and there appears to be a lot of cases where victims decide not to follow through with testifying against their attackers, merely because of their fear of being in the room with them. This seems to be particularly common in cases of sexual assault. Can’t they just not have the accused attacker not appear in court when the victim testifies?

In: Other

11 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

What you’re suggesting would produce an even greater endemic of wrongful convictions than already exists. Bluntly, it’s a fascist suggestion.